On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:26:43PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> Paul Burba wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> >> If Paul is travelling this week and thus won't get to integrating
> >> his branch this week, then why should I have to wait in order to
> >> start comitting code on trunk that is based on Bert's new conflict
> >> storage? :) Cause right now I'm already hacking in a local working
> >> copy with a patched client that is already over the bump (with a
> >> format 30 that's different to Paul's!
> >
> > Don't let my branch stop you from bumping Stefan, have at it. This is
> > great IMHO, it may make people more appreciative of the auto upgrade
> > issues.
>
> For the record, sounds good to me too: that is, we shouldn't be too afraid of doing format bumps, despite the minor inconveniences.
I've committed the bump in r1387742, and then fixed some test fallout
in subsequent revisions (forgot about checking on the authz tests before
commit...). As of r1387787 we should be in good shape. Thanks all!
Received on 2012-09-20 00:23:44 CEST