[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Inline added-item properties in REPORT response

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:10:30 -0400

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:04 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> I misremembered Greg and Justin's attitude toward my approach, thinking they
> were just flatly opposed. As I re-read the relevant threads, though, I
> think it's clear that perhaps both my approach and their PROPFIND-Depth-1
> approach would be valuable. The problem, as I see it, is that the
> complexity of the PROPFIND-Depth-1 change is far greater than my simple
> patch, and nobody is stepping up to own it.

Yes, I don't think it was that we were flatly opposed - it's that we
can figure out a way to reduce the number of requests even against
older servers - which is a good thing. But, let's not stand in the
way of progress if there is a new server. So, commit away! -- justin
Received on 2012-08-30 12:11:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.