[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:16:45 -0400

Thanks for that reminder! mphippard, pburba and I were just talking about
this yesterday as something we want to do for 1.8.
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 tracks this request.

On 08/15/2012 04:07 PM, Cedric JP. Brasey wrote:
> Please please please. Can we make the client version part of the messages? I
> would love to have that available in the hooking.
>
> I'll even buy you a pint!
>
>
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: C. Michael Pilato
> Sent: 15/08/2012 19:46
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0
>
> On 08/15/2012 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>>> Inherited Properties: Paul has the basic property inheritence and local
>>> caching mechanism working on his branch, and almost ready to begin
>>> validating his approach by implementing one of our wishlist items (inherited
>>> default ignores, or inherited default auto-props). Paul, Mark and I agree
>>> that we needn't verify that server-dictated configuration is All Good(tm)
>>> before deeming the inherited properties work trunk-worthy, but we also
>>> realize that
>>
>> I'd be quite happy if 1.8 had inherited properties and the actual
>> server-directed configuration goodies happened in 1.9, if that got 1.8
>> released a couple months sooner.
>>
>> Of the two initial config options, I think default auto-props are more
>> likely to be immediately useful to users than inherited ignores -- i.e.,
>> I'm aware of users asking for the former, but not that much for the latter.
>
> +1 to all of the above.
>
>>> Symmetic Merge: Looks like Julian and Paul are sufficiently satisfied with
>>> this feature as to go live in trunk with it. I don't, however, know what
>>> 1.8-must-have work remains here.
>>
>> Mostly docs and cleanup, IIRC.
>
> Sweet.
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ]-----------------------------------------------[
> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may also be legally privileged.
> They are intended solely for the intended addressee. If you are not the addressee
> please e-mail it back to the sender and then immediately, permanently delete it. Do
> not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it. This e-mail may be monitored
> by Planet Side Limited in accordance with current regulations. This footnote also
> confirms that this e-mail message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses
> currently known to Planet Side Limited. However, the recipient is responsible for virus-checking
> before opening this message and any attachment. Unless expressly stated to the contrary,
> any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not
> necessarily reflect the views of Planet Side Limited.
>
> http://www.planet-side.co.uk

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-08-16 15:17:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.