Re: Is there a way to post a comment to a subversion issue without agreeing to colabnet terms?

From: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:38:07 -0400

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> To be fair, Apache Bloodhound (incubating) is just one option. We
> could preserve issue numbers with a migration to Bugzilla, Jira, or
> Google Code. (not sure if other options have been raised as options,
> in the past)
>
> My leanings are towards Google Code's tracker, but I like the idea
> that Apache Bloodhound could integrate with our version control (where
> GC never could).
>
> The migration tool is an important point. We're still on IssueZilla at
> tigris, primarily because we don't have a migration tool.

And the migration tool will probably have to be hand-rolled, iirc.

-Hyrum
Received on 2012-08-14 14:38:42 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: [PATCH] Don't strip Content-Type in .po files on Windows"
Previous message: Philip Martin: "Re: [PATCH] Don't strip Content-Type in .po files on Windows"
In reply to: Greg Stein: "Re: Is there a way to post a comment to a subversion issue without agreeing to colabnet terms?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]