Making it visible, and easier to maintain going forward.
Also it's possibly easier to tell persuade someone to "install <this
branch on the official repository>" than to "<rebuild with this patch>".
Роман Донченко wrote on Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 00:51:28 +0400:
> Well, I could, but what would be the point?
>
> Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> писал в своём письме Mon, 13
> Aug 2012 09:54:14 +0400:
>
> >If nothing else, feel free to at least create a feature branch off of
> >trunk and commit the patch there.
> >
> >http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#lightweight-branches
> >
> >Gavin Baumanis wrote on Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:06:48 +1000:
> >>Ping.
> >>This message has received no comments.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Роман Донченко [mailto:dpb_at_corrigendum.ru]
> >>Sent: Monday, 6 August 2012 09:19
> >>To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> >>Subject: [PATCH] Don't strip Content-Type in .po files on Windows
> >>
> >>Greetings,
> >>
> >>I submitted this patch a couple of years ago, but it didn't get
> >>much attention. I still think it's relevant, so I'll try again.
> >>
> >>[[[
> >>On Windows, don't strip the Content-Type field from .po files
> >>during their compilation.
Received on 2012-08-14 11:52:01 CEST