Re: [PATCH] Make ra_serf be more aggressive about closing directories in update

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:20 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Justin, you appear to have resurfaced (to a degree, at least). Did you ever
> complete this work?

No.

AFAICT, the rewrite of the XML parsing used in update.c and the Depth:
1 PROPFIND hasn't been completed either. I think it probably makes
sense to complete that and then evaluate whether we still need to
tackle this memory issue.

FWIW, last week, I went down the path of trying to optimize the 'ls'
client path - which issues two OPTIONS requests...which is kinda
silly, but to remove it, requires that the RA open call also return
the youngest revision. I rev'd all of the RA layers, but then got
stuck in a maze of twisty calls inside libsvn_client to try and use
that revnum to skip the later call which invokes OPTIONS again...I
should probably post that incomplete patch before moving on to
something else. =)

HTH. -- justin
Received on 2012-08-10 12:21:16 CEST