Re: svn commit: r1365324 - reparenting an RA session each time it's used

C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 21:31:49 -0400:
> For ra_svn: I was totally wrong. This thing always requires network
> activity: a "reparent" command/response at best; at worst, the complete
> teardown and re-opening of the session. This is just a side-effect of the
> stateful protocol. Unlike with HTTP, the server here is privy to the
> "session URL" concept -- clients only perform operations using relpaths
> against that URL -- and so the server must be told when that has changed.

So... should we revv ra_svn so 1.8 clients/servers can talk to each
other exclusively in repos-root-relative paths?
Received on 2012-07-25 16:37:44 CEST