Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:09:54 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> writes:
>
> > Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:49:36 +0100:
> >>
> >> I attached to the issue a repository that demonstrates the corruption;
> >> verify doesn't report a problem on that repository. What does verify
> >> check?
> >
> > validate_root_noderev() catches an instance of the #4129 corruption and
> > in its docstring xrefs svn_fs_fs__verify(), so I think the checks in the
> > former are done in the latter too.
>
> validate_root_noderev is only called by write_final_rev and not during
> verify. svn_fs_fs__verify calls svn_fs_fs__verify_root and that does:
>
> /* Issue #4129: bogus predecessors. */
> /* Check 1: predecessor must be an earlier revision.
> */
> if (pred_rev >= root->rev)
> return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT, NULL,
> "r%ld's root node's predecessor is r%ld"
> " but must be earlier revision",
> root->rev, pred_rev);
The check was included in svn_fs_fs__verify_root() in r1349313:
/* Verify explicitly the predecessor of the root. */
{
...
/* Check the predecessor's revision. */
if (pred_id)
{
SVN_ERR(svn_fs_fs__dag_get_node(&pred, root->fs, pred_id, pool));
SVN_ERR(svn_fs_fs__dag_get_revision(&pred_rev, pred, pool));
if (pred_rev+1 != root->rev)
/* Issue #4129. */
return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT, NULL,
"r%ld's root node's predecessor is r%ld",
root->rev, pred_rev);
}
{
Received on 2012-07-25 12:59:01 CEST