Re: modify-file within an added tree (r1356317) ; possibly rep-cache.db -related
From: Trent Nelson <trent_at_snakebite.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 23:17:28 -0700
On 7/8/12 11:48 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 15:09:38 +0100:
That's a pretty impressive invariant violation. Enversion would have
I've also never come across this in the wild. We should definitely ping
>>Isn't svnsync correct to complain in this case?
>I'd like to resolve the situation on the live svn.a.o repository. I see
I'd lean towards a scripted version of option 1. You could then
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.