On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:30:42AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 11:24 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >>> It also still fails when there are unversioned targets, which pre-Berlin
> >>> gracefully "Skip"ped. :-(
> >>
> >> r1353587. I think this gets us back to where we were.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it really brings us back where we were.
>
> Sorry. I was referring merely to the where-we-were-ness of, "Can Mike
> perform his daily all-projects update with seeing an error." Yeah, kinda
> self-centered, but what can I say?
>
> (I've taken taken the first glance at how --accept behavior is different now.)
Bert, I think your concerns are valid, but can you please file them
as issues with 1.8.0 milestone or start a new discussion thread for
each? I know you've had more concerns than just this one and while
I appreciate you making us aware of them it would be better if we
kept them in separate first-class discussion threads or issues so
they don't get lost. Thanks.
Received on 2012-06-25 17:37:40 CEST