Re: Trunk regression? ('svn update *')

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:57:52 -0400

On 06/25/2012 09:42 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> It's a silly bug I introduced where the new codes tries to resolve conflicts
> in an unversioned directory, the parent of all update targets in your case.
> Should be fixed as of r1353532.

Sweet. I was hoping it was something that simple. Thanks, Stefan.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on 2012-06-25 15:58:26 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dmitry Pavlenko: "[PATCH] Wrong condition is checked to understend whether to reset translated_size value in NODES table"
Previous message: Mark Phippard: "Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1353366 compiled Jun 25 2012, 00:21:32"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Trunk regression? ('svn update *')"
Next in thread: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Trunk regression? ('svn update *')"
Reply: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Trunk regression? ('svn update *')"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]