Re: ra_serf and NULL propvals, take 2

On Jun 21, 2012 8:23 PM, "Greg Stein" <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2012 7:22 PM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/21/2012 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > > Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly
> > > requested non-existent properties.
> >
> > Ignore this. It fails tests in an odd way.
>
> ps_props and ret_props are 4-level hashes. I'm not sure that the copy
loop does the correct merging.
>
> Look at the set_ver_prop function to get an idea of the overall structure.

And also: sorry. I forgot this aspect when we were chatting about overlays.
I didn't mean to misdirect like that :-(

I have thought about moving the code to more traditional prop hashes, and
did some of that work a few months ago, but it has a ways to go.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2012-06-21 22:22:41 CEST