[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of trunk

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:00:21 +0300

Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:37:14 -0400:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
> >> on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk
> >> today?"
> >
> > There have been 3-4 new FSFS features in 1.8 (incremental hotcopy,
> > dir deltification, etc).  I would have liked to review those but
> > ENOTIME.  Perhaps we should attempt to weed out bugs in those before
> > release (via reviewing or exercising the code?).
>
> Oh, I think we certainly have time for that review, and definitely a
> bug/soak cycle. The svnrdump and local-move work are each a month or
> so, I'd guess.
>
> I'm just wondering if we can get a handle on the precise things that
> need to be completed, fixed, or backed out. We've been coding without

What I had in mind was just testing and bugfixing --- though we do have
a precedent for pulling out a feature altogether at the last minute.

> a specific endpoint, so looking at trunk can give us a good idea of
> where/what that endpoint may be.
>

How about ensuring subversion.apache.org/roadmap is up to date?

> Cheers,
> -g
Received on 2012-06-21 20:01:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.