On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Hyrum K Wright
<hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Vladimir Berezniker <vmpn_at_hitechman.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Hyrum K Wright <
> hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com>
> > wrote:
> >> * We're in the middle of a rather large effort to move from the
> >> current delta editor to something called Ev2. Ev2 should be simpler
> >> from a bindings perspective, but it won't be fully implemented for a
> >> while. When it is implemented, it's something you'll want to support,
> >> but we don't have a concrete timeline for it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I saw the emails and took a peek on the branch, it did look simpler to
> me.
> > I did not look at it in huge detail though. I figured I need to get
> > javahl-ra to a
> > stable point and then see what it takes to port it to ev2 branch, once
> the
> > editor
> > v2 API considered stable enough (which it could be already).
>
> The best place to look would be svn_editor.h, which defines the formal
> API specification. The API itself is very stable by this point, it's
> just simply* a matter converting the existing systems over to it.
> Because the delta editor is deeply embedded across a large part of the
> codebase, this is an ongoing piece of work.
>
> The RA layer (on trunk) already exposes Ev2 via the
> svn_ra__get_commit_ev2() API. Feel free to use it, knowing that its
> implementation is still quite experimental, and that it may change /
> go away at some point (but not the Ev2 concept).
>
That is great, it will make it much easier being able to work with it
straight on the javahl-branch.
Thank you,
Vladimir
Received on 2012-06-14 14:54:36 CEST