Changing the log API is not worth it

Hi all,

Yesterday, I discovered an inconsistency in our log API.
svn_revnum_t is a long while the "limit" parameter is
an int.

Since we have a practical limit of 2^31 on our revision
numbers and because int is (at least) 32 bits on all our
targets, switching the limit parameter to long is a pretty
much a mere formality.

The fix ripples through all ra layers and such blowing
the patch up to more then 700 lines. So, I think it is
simply not worth it.

-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2012-06-14 13:19:33 CEST