[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1348131 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:19:58 -0700

On Friday, June 8, 2012, C. Michael Pilato wrote:

> On 06/08/2012 03:15 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > Wow, but performance will be much more interesting if we inline
> > properties to REPORT response. Mike, could you please share your
> > incomplete patch for including properties to REPORT response?
>
> Sure. Attached.

I would still prefer the PROPFIND Depth 1 strategy as that won't be
dependent upon a server upgrade.

At the least, this patch will give us a ballpark figure to shoot for in
reducing the per-file PROPFINDs...maybe we ought to implement both
techniques, but I think Depth 1 will bring us pretty close and not require
server changes...I expect the delta in perf between these two won't be
huge...we can always do a bake-off! -- justin
Received on 2012-06-10 09:20:34 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.