Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > So far, beyond Philip's concern about traffic/CPU tradeoff, and a
> > couple open issues... I think we're in good shape to pull the lever.
>
> As I said elsethread, this is probably the best overview of open
> ra_serf blockers:
>
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?subcomponent=libsvn_ra_serf&issue_status=NEW&issue_status=STARTED&issue_status=REOPENED&target_milestone=1.8.0
>
> For convenience, I'm pasting the current result of this query here:
>
> 3968: DEFAULT_HTTP_TIMEOUT is way too high for serf
> 3969: ra_serf should check for cancellation from loops around
> serf_context_run()
>

I think these two issues are overlapping, at least in their root cause and
solution. Added a suggestion to issue 3968 on how to fix them.

Lieven
Received on 2012-05-21 19:28:49 CEST