[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 12:20:37 -0700

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> I'm still in favor to include properties in update REPORT (Mike's
> approach). PROPFINDs are not cached by proxies and working copy. There
> are relatively small, so there is no real benefit to fetch them using
> separate request.

If you do that, then you have to store all of the properties in-memory
for the entire checkout or serialize on to disk or something
similar...ugh.

I'd also be curious how much extra time it takes to include the
properties in the REPORT response - it's not going to be free and may
not even be cheap. =( -- justin
Received on 2012-05-19 21:21:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.