Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> PROPFIND per directory has another problem: we have to save properties
> for all children of directory in memory.

This ultimately depends upon how Ev2 structures it - if we can't feed
the editor with the properties until the individual children are
processed, then yes, we have to stash it in memory (within the RA
layer) until we process the nodes. However, if we can deliver all of
the properties via Ev2 as soon as the PROPFIND response comes in, we
don't have that concern - ultimately, that makes it libsvn_wc's issue
about how to handle the atomicity/incompleteness issue - which I
*think* would be far more solvable...but YMMV. -- justin
Received on 2012-05-19 18:13:02 CEST