[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:25:28 +0300

C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, May 17, 2012 at 16:34:09 -0400:
> On 05/17/2012 04:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Short query: is this possible?
> >>
> >> Long query:
> >>
> >> Hyrum has been doing some heavy lifting on moving our code to Ev2 for
> >> commits. That work can be merged soonish, but a strong argument can be made
> >> for "only when all RA providers have an Ev2 commit editor" (because
> >> otherwise poor-perf shims are used). ra_local already has the needed editor,
> >> and I've been doing work on ra_serf to stabilize a base for writing the Ev2
> >> editor. Somebody is going to need to write an editor for ra_svn. My
> >> query/suggestion is to delete ra_neon rather than needing to write an editor
> >> for it.
> >>
> > [..]
> >
> > I believe that best solution would be to merge ra_neon and ra_serf in
> > one ra_http RA provider which can be configured to which http library
> > to use: neon or serf (or maybe WinHTTP in future).
>
> Ewww. You are evil. Go away, and come back when you are less evil.
>
> Just kidding. But seriously ... evil.

So why won't Ivan's idea work?

(I assume it won't work, but now that it's been aired it would be nice
to hear from an ra_serf person _why_ it won't work.)
Received on 2012-05-19 16:26:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.