[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:26:39 +0400

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:02 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 11:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On May 17, 2012 10:27 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net
>> <mailto:cmpilato_at_collab.net>> wrote:
>>>...
>>> No, I haven't yet taken a crack at removing the HEAD request.  That will
>>> significantly help the fetch-from-pristine-cache situation, but this is a
>>> parallel line of optimization that needs to occur.
>>
>> Yup. Doable; not worried about it. Along with Depth:1 PROPFINDs. I'd like to
>> try the latter before patching. From your test, we see the checkout goes
>> from 1915 down to 203 PROPFINDs. I can make that happen against unpatched
>> servers.
>
> Yup, agreed that would make sense.  Those 203 PROPFINDs would be bigger, but
> as I think we've established, the real cost here is in the turnaround, not
> the processing of any one request/response.
>
May be stupid question: why do we need these 203 PROPFINDs for each directory?

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2012-05-17 22:27:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.