[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 23:52:21 +0200

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Moe, Mark <mark.moe_at_medtronic.com> wrote:
>> I rewrote some parts of the commit processing on trunk last week, which
>> should have a positive effect on the use cases reported in this thread.
>> Is it possible for somebody to see what the performance difference on NFS
>> is?
> Does this include Phillip's patch (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4176) or is this a similar performance improvement not related to that patch?
> Please excuse my question; I'm new to testing the source:  if I compile the trunk (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/), then am I getting a lot of changes compared with the release v1.7.4?  I'm asking because I wonder if it would be better to test Bert's changes directly applied to v1.7.4 (with or without Philip's patch for bug 4176) for comparison sake.

I don't know the extent of Bert's changes in this area, but it's
likely that it will not be easy to backport that to the 1.7.x
codebase. But if it is backportable, sure, that would be a good
comparison ...

Another possible useful comparison could be to compare "trunk" with


Please do not send such legal boilerplate, it doesn't make any sense
on a public (and archived) mailinglist. If you're forced to use it by
your company, you should probably get and use another email address
for these mailinglists ...

Received on 2012-05-15 23:53:19 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.