[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.7.5 candidates

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:24:17 +0300

Philip Martin wrote on Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:08:20 +0100:
> Is this something we need to make explicit? Perhaps the release manager
> should be signing something else? The checksums perhaps? Would that be
> strong enough?

The RM could sign the rot13 of the zip files, that'd be more secure than
signing the checksums. But I'm not convinced that we need to introduce
this complication.
Received on 2012-05-15 19:24:59 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.