Re: Merge-relevant information that is hard to come by

On Apr 29, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:

> Another such case that I ran into recently is
> with reverse-merging changes. Those "un-merged"
> revisions seem not to re-appear on the "eligible
> for merge" list. Don't remember the specifics, though.

I seem to recall that that was a conscious decision: if the user performed a reverse-merge to undo a change, then the user has made a conscious choice and doesn't want to have to keep reverse-merging that change every time the branches might otherwise be sync'ed together.
Received on 2012-05-15 13:25:04 CEST