[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1335639 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:09:19 -0400

On 05/08/2012 03:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> One question: the ordering of PROPFIND and GET. Do you know if that is
> a requirement, or simply that you were preserving prior behavior?

Upon reflection, it's probably not a hard requirement. In general, I
suppose it's easier (and more efficient) to cache properties and stream
contents while we drive an editor than the reverse, so that's probably why
that ordering was chosen prior.

I recall running into *some* problem when I tried to handle the contents
inline (while processing the REPORT response). I can't recall for sure what
that was, though (weekends are just fantastic amnesia drugs, sometimes!),
but I think it boiled down to trying to figure out how to practically drive
the editor partially, leaving the file baton open until some future
pipelined PROPFIND request response was finally processed.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-05-08 22:10:02 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.