[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of ra_serf?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 19:55:29 +0300

Greg Stein wrote on Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:45:20 -0400:
> On May 2, 2012 10:26 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd hate for us to end up in the same
> > difficult situation as with the 1.7 release: trying to make it the
> > default but then realizing shortly before release that it isn't stable
> > enough (partly because it hadn't seen enough coverage, and people
> > didn't report problems so they could be fixed etc, etc...). In spite
> > of the request in the 1.7-release notes for users to try out serf and
> > report problems [1], I haven't seen many new reports ...
> Because maybe it works? Ever consider that?

I recall multiple binary packagers claiming they won't enable serf by
default in 1.7, even if it were our (upstream) default. Perhaps we
don't get reports because no new users switch from neon to serf (ie,
whoever uses serf also used it in the 1.6 era).
Received on 2012-05-02 18:56:08 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.