[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Note on implementing Symmetric Merge

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:57:32 +0100 (BST)

Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:

> Since symmetric merge has more freedom in
> choosing base and merge order, the meaning
> of "base", "mine", "theirs" etc. might become
> ambiguous if they are being derived automatically
> from the diff3 being executed. I simply want
> to note that we might need to explicitly tell
> the wc which input has which meaning for a
> given merge step.

Yes, a fair point that the terms might become more ambiguous and inconsistent than they already are, so we may need to be more explicit.

- Julian
Received on 2012-04-25 09:58:08 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.