Re: Merge policies

On 20.04.2012 23:45, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> We could even be more permissive: as long as the merge
> does not cross "switch boundaries" (switched / non-
> switched or switched to different URL) as may allow
> the merge.
>
> This could be a somewhat typical use-case for people
> using switched WCs. I would expect that these users
> want to merge into those sub-trees just like they
> would also 'svn up' them.

Doesn't merging in a switched subtree almost by definition imply
creating subtree mergeinfo? I was under the impression that we wanted to
more or less forbid such merges at some point in the future.

-- Brane
Received on 2012-04-21 11:55:13 CEST