On Feb 29, 2012 9:08 AM, "Stefan Sperling" <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:25:45AM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Feb 29, 2012 8:02 AM, <neels_at_apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Author: neels
> > > Revision: 1292402
> > > Modified property: svn:log
> > >
> > > Modified: svn:log at Wed Feb 29 13:02:36 2012
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --- svn:log (original)
> > > +++ svn:log Wed Feb 29 13:02:36 2012
> > > @@ -1,2 +1,8 @@
> > > On the 1.7.x-issue4102 branch, merge the following from trunk,
resolving
> > > conflicts: r1233292, r1245711, r1245746, r1245764, r1245809,
r1245929,
> > r1245935
> > > +
> > > +Modification of r1245711:
> > > +svn_kind_t does not exist in 1.7.x. So instead of using svn_kind_t in
> > > +svn_wc__db_t.parse_cache, add an IS_SYMLINK flag next to the
> > svn_node_kind_t.
> > > +Also affects get_path_kind() and
svn_wc__db_wcroot_parse_local_abspath()
> > > +in wc_db_wcroot.c.
> >
> > What?! We have svn_wc__db_kind_t in 1.7.x to represent symlinks.
> >
> > -g
>
> This backport would have been more intrusive if we also switched
> the existing 1.7 code over from using svn_node_kind_t to
svn_wc__db_kind_t.
>
> If you really prefer that we can do it. But I'd argue it's extra work
> for no gain. In trunk we already made the code use svn_kind_t.
> For 1.7 we should primarily fix broken behaviour rather than investing
> time in extra touches to make the code more beautiful.
I guess I should look at that branch, but Neels mentioned wc_db functions.
So those should already be using db_kind, not node_kind.
Cheer,
-g
Received on 2012-02-29 15:20:36 CET