Looks like this got pulled out in a later STATUS update. I'm assuming
the group merges fine without my change?
(it may be handy to merge anyways, to avoid potential future merge conflicts)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:43, <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Tue Feb 28 10:43:21 2012
> New Revision: 1294566
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294566&view=rev
> * STATUS: Predict that gstein's cosmetic fix will be required, too.
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1294566&r1=1294565&r2=1294566&view=diff
> --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Tue Feb 28 10:43:21 2012
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Candidate changes:
> +1: stsp, rhuijben
> * r1293945, r1293972, r1293976, r1293998, r1294136, r1294236;
> - r1294134, r1294147
> + r1294134, r1294147, r1294364, rXXX
> Two interdependent changes:
> Fix issue #4121: copy followed by delete of unreadable child.
> Fix svn:// authz in Python tests.
> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ Candidate changes:
> r1294134 extends a test to demonstrate its brokenness.
> r1294147 fixes said brokenness.
> + r1294364 is included to avoid conflicts with rXXX.
> + rXXX fixes r1294147 for Windows.
> +1: danielsh
Received on 2012-02-29 01:55:48 CET