AW: Conflict on identical binary files

Hi, Daniel,

The mismatching commend sneaked in because I copied the test case above as a start of my test. :-(

I just was about to add a patch for the 2 README files to clarify the issues, and just noticed that phurba already committed a text explaining when to assign an issue, and how to mark it for C and Python tests.

So there's one issue left: Adding new python tests to the end of the list.

I attached a patch to clarify the documentation in this point.

--- commit message ---

* subversion/tests/cmdline/README
  Mention that new python tests should be added to the end of the list.

--- end of broadcast ---

Best regards

Markus Schaber

-- 
___________________________
We software Automation.
3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax +49-831-54031-50
Email: m.schaber@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com 
CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com
Download CoDeSys sample projects: http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects
Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915 
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danielsh_at_elego.de] 
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Februar 2012 15:11
An: Markus Schaber
Cc: Subversion Dev (dev_at_subversion.apache.org)
Betreff: Re: Conflict on identical binary files
Welcome aboard Markus.  There were a few issues with this patch:
* No log message
* A typo in the docstring
* A comment about binary props that didn't match the code below it
* No issue number for a new XFail test
They were easy to fix, and the patch itself was good, so I've fixed them myself and with the issue number you've provided on IRC (#4128) committed this as r1294161.
Thanks for the patch,
Daniel
Markus Schaber wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:42:29 +0000:
> Hi,
> 
> Von: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.martin_at_wandisco.com]
> > Markus Schaber <m.schaber_at_3s-software.com> writes:
> 
> >> The last step (svn update) triggers a conflict prompt for svnobj, 
> >> despite the fact that the remote and local files are bit-for-bit 
> >> identical.
> >>
> >> As I was told by Daniel Shahaf, he expects this case to be resolved 
> >> without a conflict.
> 
> > We could resolve the conflict in this case, but there is currently no code to do it.  Perhaps libsvn_wc/merge.c:merge_file_trivial could detect this case and set svn_wc_merge_unchanged?
> 
> As discussed on IRC, and as a first step to the solution, I created a test case on the weekend. See the attached diff.
> 
> I hope I'll find time to develop a fix during the next days (and 
> actually get my feet wet deep in the Subversion code base for the 
> first time - woohoo. :-)
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Markus Schaber
> --
> ___________________________
> We software Automation.
> 
> 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
> Markus Schaber | Developer
> Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | 
> Fax +49-831-54031-50
> 
> Email: m.schaber@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com 
> CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com Download CoDeSys 
> sample projects: 
> http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects
> 
> Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | 
> Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915