Re: MTime resurrected
From: Rick Yorgason <rick_at_longbowgames.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:59:30 -0500
On 17/02/2012 9:55 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
Okay, we have a misunderstanding here. We both agree that existing
As far as I can tell (and let me know if I'm wrong) there's a fairly
* Commit only sends the text-time if the file passes some filter or option.
and I was picturing it as:
* Commit always sends the text-time.
I think the second option is safer, since it's easier to change your
With that in mind...
> It's not an option, it's an important decision that is intrinsic to the
Originally I thought you were proposing that users would install svn
From my point of view (the "decide on update" view) there's two options:
A) Don't count mtime-only updates as modifications.
I was proposing the simpler option, which is A.
> Forget about the default behaviout, that is not going to change (your
The current behaviour already moves mtime into the future. Are there any
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.