On 2012-02-17 9:06 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I wouldn't call that email a "design worked out". My reply to that email posed a load of questions and issues to be clarified or re-thought, and wasn't answered AFAICT. Other people did the same and did get some more discussion in that thread, but there was never a follow-up draft of that proposal AFAICT.
You're right, there was no follow-up draft; we're just using the phrase
"worked out" differently; I meant "discussed", not "finalized".
I know there was some heat generated over this feature, so let me be
clear: my goal here isn't to flame anybody, but merely to summarize any
forgotten details and to continue to discuss the design until it can be
Received on 2012-02-17 15:29:01 CET