[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1240755 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:08:46 +0200

stefan2_at_apache.org wrote on Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 16:03:51 -0000:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Feb 5 16:03:51 2012
> New Revision: 1240755
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1240755&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Add r1240752 and vote for it.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1240755&r1=1240754&r2=1240755&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Sun Feb 5 16:03:51 2012
> @@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ Candidate changes:
> Votes:
> +1: rhuijben, philip
>
> + * r1240752
> + Workround for a faulty APR truncate() implementation. When rep sharing

A bit more info please? What APR platforms/versions are affected?

Thanks --

Daniel

> + has been activated on FSFS repositories, a rep will be truncated from
> + the file after it has been found to be a duplicate of some existing rep.
> + If this happens high up in the tree (in the root folder, preferrably),
> + not enough data may be written afterwards (parant directories + list
> + of changes in that revision) to fully overwrite the stale rep content.
> + Justification:
> + Rare but real source of corruption.
> + Votes:
> + +1: stefan2
> +
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
>
>
Received on 2012-02-05 17:09:43 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.