On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
> My scripts build both ways on the buildbots and don't fail, but I don't
> see a problem with the fix.
>
> Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
> From: Paul Burba
> Sent: 3-2-2012 9:01
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: Johan Corveleyn; dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1239695 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./
> STATUS build.conf contrib/server-side/mod_dontdothat/
> tools/server-side/mod_dontdothat/
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcorvel_at_gmail.com]
>>> Sent: donderdag 2 februari 2012 14:36
>>> To: Stephen Butler
>>> Cc: dev_at_subversion.apache.org; rhuijben_at_apache.org; Stefan Sperling; C.
>>> Michael Pilato
>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1239695 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./
>> STATUS
>>> build.conf contrib/server-side/mod_dontdothat/ tools/server-
>>> side/mod_dontdothat/
>>
>>> Thanks for confirming. I just proposed r1227900 for backport.
>>
>> I don't have this problem in my build, but you can add my +1 for
>> backporting.
>
> I also could build mod_dontdothat on 1.7 without r1227900. Bert,
> IIRC, like me, you build with static libraries (--disable-shared). I
> tried to build with shared libs and the build failed. Johan, I assume
> you are building with shared libs?
>
> P.S. I gave r1227900 the third vote in STATUS.
>
Thanks for the votes.
Yes, I'm building with shared libs (no --disable-shared). In fact,
here is my Makefile in attachment. I've been using this one since the
first day I got involved in svn, and it has served me well ...
(credits go to danielsh by the way :-), his posting of this Makefile
to the users list got the ball rolling for me).
Maybe you guys can spot something in there that's different, or somehow related?
--
Johan
- application/octet-stream attachment: Makefile
Received on 2012-02-03 22:03:35 CET