On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:05, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and
>>> > STATUS there are number of items which could potentially make up a
>>> > 1.7.3 release. It's been a couple of months since 1.7.2, so it
>>> > appears that a 1.7.3 should come sooner rather than later. Perhaps
>>> > sometime next week would be reasonable?
>>> I have been thinking we are due for a 1.7.3 as well.
>>> FWIW, I am travelling next week so cannot test and sign on Windows.
>>> If someone else does not step forward to provide the 3rd signature,
>>> then worst case I can sign it the following week when I am back. Or
>>> you could corral the STATUS file next week and cut the tarball over
>>> the weekend or the following week.
>> I'm also travelling next week, but I'm probably able to provide a signature
>> from my hotel.
>> That should work, assuming that I don't have hardware and/or network
>> problems at home when I'm in the US.
> I'm also traveling next week and cannot test and provide Windows signatures :)
Seems I'm the exception :-), I'll be quietly at home next week, so
I'll be able to provide a Windows sig :-).
Apart from that, +1 to roll 1.7.3 as soon as we're able, in the hope
that it will reduce the number of problem reports from assertions on
Received on 2012-01-25 19:41:44 CET