Re: Implicit keep-alive after reintegrate merge

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:53:43 +0000 (GMT)

I've committed my latest version of this work to the new 'reintegrate-keep-alive' branch in r1234919.

I'm working on explaining how this stuff relates to ClearCase's model and the need or non-need for a difference between "reintegrate" and "normal" merges in Subversion.

- Julian
Received on 2012-01-23 18:54:20 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philip Martin: "Re: request to clarify and improve Subversion property name specification"
Previous message: Garret Wilson: "Re: request to clarify and improve Subversion property name specification"
In reply to: Branko Čibej: "Re: Implicit keep-alive after reintegrate merge"
Next in thread: Branko Čibej: "Re: Implicit keep-alive after reintegrate merge"
Reply: Branko Čibej: "Re: Implicit keep-alive after reintegrate merge"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]