Re: Implicit keep-alive after reintegrate merge

On 20.01.2012 03:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> To rule out the common case: are you familiar with Stefan's post giving
> a reasons for this?

Nope.

> His argument is that 'cd trunk-wc && svn merge ^/branches/feature-branch'
> and 'cd 1.7.x-wc && svn merge ^/trunk' are syntactically indistinguishable
> but need to execute a semantically different algorithm each.

Huh. Why? How are branches, once created, not partial mirrors of each
other, with the missing bits noted in mergeinfo? Do you have a link to
the post? I'm really intrigued about this assertion.

-- Brane
Received on 2012-01-20 09:53:43 CET