Re: Implicit keep-alive after reintegrate merge
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:32:49 +0000 (GMT)
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> What do we want in this case? The options are basically:
The options I'm listing are all the options that I think could serve the user well, with different options being best in different circumstances.
As explained on <http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/KeepingReintegratedBranchAlive>, I mean that option (1) should record the revision as merged and (2) not record it. Neither of those is what my previous patch did; it skipped but recorded, which is great for the simple case but not for the general case.
> (3) figure out what really "should" be merged and merge it;
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.