[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [patch] applying patch can fail with dry_run

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:13:48 +0000

Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> writes:

> Question is: do we need the notifications for deleting empty dirs in a
> dry-run? If yes, then this get's complicated:
> the error is thrown from svn_wc_walk_status() called in
> check_dir_empty. I could just not call that function in case of a
> dry-run, or catch that specific error and go on. But then the
> notifications wouldn't be completely accurate anymore.
> So assuming we don't want to extend svn_wc_walk_status to take a
> dry-run param, the notifications for deleting empty dirs wouldn't be
> accurate.
> Should I just change delete_empty_dirs() to not use the dry_run param
> and not get the notifications for those in a dry-run?
> I think no notifications is better than inaccurate ones (at least in a
> dry-run).

I'm not clear what problem the patch is triggering. I assume the patch
deletes one or more files but then what happens?

At present a --dry-run patch that deletes a file will track the
deletions and notify about a directory that would be empty and deleted,
we don't want to lose that feature.

uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
Received on 2012-01-12 21:14:29 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.