Re: file_handle_cache branch ready for review
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:07:38 +0000 (GMT)
Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
+1 to all this. I take your point about maintaining two versions; in the past we've mainly (only?) done this with very small additions to APR. And I overlooked the fact that this (file handle caching) can be an optional feature.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.