[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] Server Dictated Configuration

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:09:27 +0200

Paul Burba wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 14:44:02 -0500:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > If the option name is valid but the option value is not, will the server
> > still send the configuration option to the client? Will it send some default
> > value instead of the invalid value? Or will it omit the option from the list
> > of configuration options sent to the client?
> I'll defer on this until we come to some consensus on the above (but
> with options #1 and #2 this is certainly an open question).

"Valid" is a relative notion. What if the server is 1.8, the client is
1.9, and the broadcast config includes a new-in-1.9 setting?

> Paul
Received on 2012-01-05 02:10:15 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.