stsp_at_apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41:21 -0000:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Dec 23 14:41:20 2011
> New Revision: 1222693
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222693&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> (read_children_info): Now that the repos_id problem is better understood
> (see issue #4087), simplify the associated error message.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c?rev=1222693&r1=1222692&r2=1222693&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Fri Dec 23 14:41:20 2011
> @@ -7325,28 +7325,10 @@ read_children_info(void *baton,
> return svn_error_createf(
> SVN_ERR_WC_DB_ERROR, NULL,
> _("The node '%s' comes from unexpected repository "
> + "'%s', expected '%s'; if this node is a file "
> + "external using the correct URL in the external "
> + "definition can fix the problem, see issue #4087"),
> + child_relpath, repos_root_url, last_repos_root_url);
That error documents our current understanding of the problem. Wouldn't
it be better to instead link here, not to the issue tracker, but to a FAQ
entry that (a) can document our then-current understanding of the problem,
(b) would be worded in a user-facing rather than dev-facing way?
> child->repos_root_url = repos_root_url;
> child->repos_uuid = repos_uuid;
> }
>
>
Received on 2011-12-24 16:03:23 CET