On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:17, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:35:39AM -0800, rupert.thurner wrote:
> > On Oct 21, 9:51 am, Stefan Sperling <s..._at_elego.de> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:19:08PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
> > > > on solaris, one test is failing for 1.7.0 ...
> > > > At least one test FAILED, checking /home/rupert/mgar-sav/pkg/
> > > > subversion/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/
> > > > subversion-1.7.0/tests.log
> > > > FAIL: copy_tests.py 86:changeddiraftercommitshouldmatch
> > > >checkout
> > > > Summary of test results:
> > > > 1552 tests PASSED
> > > > 42 tests SKIPPED
> > > > 23 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
> > > > 1 test FAILED
> > > > gmake: *** [check] Error 1
> > >
> > > Please show the output of:
> > >
> > > $ cd
> /home/rupert/mgar-sav/pkg/subversion/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sp
> arcv8/subversion-1.7.0/subversion/tests/cmdline
> > > $ ./copy_tests.py 86 --verbose
> >
> >
> > rupert @ unstable9s : ~/mgar-sav/pkg/subversion/trunk/work/solaris9-
> > sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/subversion-1.7.2/subversion/tests/cmdline
> > $ ./copy_tests.py 86 --verbose
>
> > PASS: copy_tests.py 86: changed dir after commit should match
> > checkout
>
> So this time, it passed. This is probably just a race condition in the
> test where it might not succeed if timestamps on disk aren't updated
> quickly enough. Can you get it to fail again by running it a couple
> of times?
>
> I think you can safely ignore this failure.
>
every time i run it with the test suite it fails. from java i know that the
timestamps on solaris are 4 digits less accurate than on windows. can this
be an issue here as well?
rupert.
Received on 2011-12-18 12:53:22 CET