Re: 0.2 draft of dumpfile documentation
From: <roderich.schupp_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:33:22 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 14, 1:37 pm, "Eric S. Raymond" <e..._at_thyrsus.com> wrote:
> 1. Is delete on a directory with children expected to succeed or fail?
Succeed. A delete on a directory actually deletes the whole subtree
> 3. Is add on an existing path expected to fail?
Yes.
> 4. What are the detailed semantics of "change" with copyfrom? I
It's an "add-with-history" immediately followed by a modification (of
> Dump decoders should be prepared for the optional lines after
No ordering of header lines whatsoever is expected (what the current
> The main reason "replace exists" is because it helps sequential
You quote that from Pilato's mail, but in this context it gives the
- internally Subversion has only the primitives add, delete, change
Note: I just checked Subversion trunk (subversion/libsvn_repos/
I think the point of Pilato's remark was this (and this should really
For all node records in one revision the Node-paths are unqiue. The
Thus a dump consumer can simply store the node records (in one
Cheers, Roderich
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.