[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Fwd: Irrelevant revisions in 'svn log' output

From: Dmitry Batrak <batrdmi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:24:59 +0400

Raised http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4069 .
I've reproduced similar issue in a local repository, and attached
steps to reproduce to the ticket. The issue seems to have been
introduced in version 1.6.17.

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Dmitry Batrak <batrdmi_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The following command:
>>
>> svn log https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/gnome-keyring/subversion/bindings/javahl@871338
>> -r 870558:871338 -g
>>
>> returns a number of irrelevant revisions (in particular, 870728,
>> 870496, 869828) in the 'main' line of the log, i.e. not as merged
>> revisions (full command output is attached).
>> Neither of the below commands return those revisions in the 'main' line:
>>
>> svn log https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/gnome-keyring/subversion/bindings/javahl@871338
>> -r 870558:871338
>>
>> svn log https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/gnome-keyring/subversion/bindings/javahl@871338
>> -r 871338:870558 -g
>>
>> I think this is a server-side problem (server seems to use 1.7.0 SVN
>> version), but, just in case, I'm using SlikSvn-1.7.1-WIN32 client.
>>
>> Is this a known bug, or should I raise an issue in the issue tracker for it?
>
> Yes, that does look like a bug.  Please raise an issue.
>
> --
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> http://www.uberSVN.com
Received on 2011-12-11 13:25:34 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.