[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Looks like wrong value for SVN_VER_REVISION in SWIG bindings for Python and Ruby?

From: Shane Turner <shane.turner_at_newpace.ca>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:39:03 -0400

Looks like the problem is still there:

$ grep SVN_VER_REVISION
subversion-{1.7.1,1.7.2,nightly}/subversion/include/svn_version.h
subversion-1.7.1/subversion/include/svn_version.h:#define
SVN_VER_REVISION 1186859
subversion-1.7.2/subversion/include/svn_version.h:#define
SVN_VER_REVISION 0
subversion-nightly/subversion/include/svn_version.h:#define
SVN_VER_REVISION 0

The nightly is
http://ci.apache.org/projects/subversion/nightlies/dist/r1211287/subversion-nightly.tar.bz2

Shane

On 07/12/2011 2:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> r1211582 should make things better.
>
> I think the nightly releases were also affected by this bug, in which
> case tonight's nightly roll should confirm the fix.
>
> http://subversion.apache.org/source-code.html#nightlies
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 19:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 19:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Sperling<stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Shane Turner wrote:
>>>>>> Should I open a bug report to have the packages regenerated,
>>>>> No. Releases are never regenerated. That would invalidate signatures
>>>>> developers sent for the release.[*]
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll have to figure out the source of the problem and then try
>>>>> to avoid it in future releases.
>>>> It may be related to the sed problem we were having in the 1.7 RC
>>>> series. Apparently one of scripts relied upon GNU sed which wasn't
>>>> installed on people.apache.org. I had been using a custom install of
>>>> it, but I thought Daniel had fixed the offending script to not require
>>>> GNU sed. 1.7.2 represents the first release in which I relied upon
>>>> the system sed, and not my custom one.
>>>>
>>> r1159741
>>>
>>> However, SVN_VER_REVISION on the 1.7.2 tag is wrong.
>> ... but SVN_VER_TAG, which incorporates the revnum, is right.
>>
>> Hmm.
>>

-- 
	
	
	
	Shane Turner
	Senior Software Developer
phone 	+1 (902) 406–8375  x1008
email 	Shane.Turner_at_NewPace.ca <mailto:Shane.Turner_at_newpace.ca>
aim <aim:GoIm?screenname=Shane.Turner_at_newpace.ca>/msn 
<msnim:chat?contact=Shane.Turner_at_newpace.ca> 	Shane.Turner_at_NewPace.ca 
<aim:GoIm?screenname=Shane.Turner_at_newpace.ca>
skype 	saturnjct <skype:saturnjct>
Received on 2011-12-08 19:39:32 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.