Re: Move tracking and NODES.moved_to/moved_here
From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:49:28 +0000
Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> writes:
>> Now consider a further merge, it will produce a tree conflict it it
Another example, see move_on_move, the new test 36 in op-depth-tests.c.
op_depth local_relpath presence moved_here moved_to
If I move A/B to B3 that move gets recorded in the A/B base node,
op_depth local_relpath presence moved_here moved_to
That's probably an error in the current implementation: it should not
Storing moves like that has consequences. The relpath A/B is now moved
I guess this may have implications when it comes to storing moves in the
-- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.comReceived on 2011-12-08 11:50:08 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.