[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Looks like wrong value for SVN_VER_REVISION in SWIG bindings for Python and Ruby?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:29:04 +0100

On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Shane Turner wrote:
> Should I open a bug report to have the packages regenerated,

No. Releases are never regenerated. That would invalidate signatures
developers sent for the release.[*]

We'll have to figure out the source of the problem and then try
to avoid it in future releases.

[*] These signatures are important to the release process because having
multiple signatures proofs the release wasn't made by a single individual
but by the Apache Subversion Project Member Committee which is legally
part of the ASF. This protects individual developers from legal attacks
because the ASF needs to be attacked instead.
Received on 2011-12-07 18:30:00 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.