Re: [Issue 4070] forced update doesn't correct eols of existing obstructions
Recorded this as
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:41:53 -0500:
> On 11/28/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > I can see the rationale for not showing it in status (since it can't be
> > committed), but I suppose there is a reason to show it --- namely, that
> > if the file has svn:eol-style=LF but the on-disk file has CRLF line
> > endings, that might break my build and I'd like the tool to tell me
> > about it.
> > I'm leaning to +1 on having 'svn status' _optionally_ report files that
> > have the wrong eol style on disk.
> I would never have assumed that 'svn status' *didn't* report such files.
> Have we always had such madness as our default behavior?!
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-12-02 09:36:12 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev